The views expressed on this blog are of the individual posting and are not official positions of the Mount Vernon Square Neighborhood Association (MVSNA)
Viewing By Entry / Main
Hide

Plans for 410 M Street NW


Last night, MVSNA considered two proposed projects for our neighborhood (1)  a new four-story condo to be built at 410 M Street NW; and (2) 1212-1216 4th Street NW, a third story set back on the existing apartment building and a 3 1/2 story building on the adjacent vacant lot at the southwest corner of 4th and Ridge.  HPRB will consider the 410 M plans at their meeting on September 23.  The 4th Street project has been postponed until the October meeting - a separate post will follow on that project.

With respect to 410 M Street NW, MVSNA lacked a quorum when we got to this item at the end of the agenda.  We therefore did not take an official position on this project.  We did, however, informally resolve to send a letter to HPRB expressing the various comments made at the meeting and any additional community feedback received via this blog post. 

The plans, courtesy of the architect, Chris Colross of SGA Companies, are available here

The primary issue raised at the meeting was in respect to height, which is 54 feet.  Zoning allows for 60 feet, however, this would be the tallest building on the block.  No zoning relief is needed and this project will proceed if approved by HPRB as a matter of right.

We discussed some options such as removing the bay at the top floor or setting back the 4th level.  HPRB has also gone back and forth with the developer as to whether the roof should slope back from the street (it does so in the current plan).

As the HPRB hearing is tomorrow, please provide any comments you have on this project asap through the blog if you would like them incorporated into MVSNA's letter to the Board.

Comments
While I am all for the development of our neighborhood, I worry that this structure might be too tall. That end of the block has a lower profile and this building (as planned) would be rather conspicuous. Perhaps a slope back from the street would allow our neighborhood to preserve more of its character.

Posted By Brian E / At 9/22/10 11:33 AM
Having a building this much taller than the rest of the block is not neighborly and will compromise the look of the street scape. Cornice lines generally match in height and are integrated into the look of a street. This disrupts that--it draws to your eye to the building, which sticks up and looks completely out of place.

What is more, the difference in height between this building and three story buildings on the block is much greater--almost twice the difference-- than between two and three story buildings on the same block.

At a minimum, the design should maintain approximate cornice height of adjacent buildings.

Posted By stephanie slewka / At 9/22/10 2:20 PM
I strongly object to the height and over all design of this proposed building for several reasons. The existing facades are primarily constructed with brick this bulding is not, therefore drawing your eye to this project making it a focal point in the street scape. The other objection is the height. Due to the narrow lot and shorter adjacent buildings the proposed building appears much higher than those along that area of the block. The building at 414 in the drawing is an in-fill project done a few years ago and blends well into the existing street scape.
Kevin Driscoll
418 MSt NW

Posted By kevin driscoll / At 9/23/10 4:19 AM
I'm opposed to the construction of this building as planned. I agree with the three comments above. The building is too high and does not fit in well with the other buildings at that end of the block. If there is a fourth floor, it should be set back, so that it is not visible from the street. I don't think the slopped roof blends in well. Also, I'm wondering if the sides of the upper floor of the building would be left unfinished (just raw block or stucco), which I think would be very unattractive from the street.

Posted By Ryan T. / At 9/23/10 7:28 AM
Yes - I agree with the comments above. The building is too high and disrupts the asthetics of the street.

Posted By Elizabeth / At 9/26/10 6:04 AM


Blog software provided by Ray Camden