The views expressed on this blog are of the individual posting and are not official positions of the Mount Vernon Square Neighborhood Association (MVSNA)
Viewing By Entry / Main
Hide

Some Pedestrian Safety Enhancements Coming, Others Not


Over the past several months (and years), MVSNA has advocated for enhanced pedestrian safety measures in the Mount Vernon area, particularly along New York Avenue between New Jersey Avenue and 5th Street NW.  Below are responses from DDOT indicating their plans for addressing our concerns.  The DDOT responses indicate that we have made progress in certain areas (5th Street turn, possibly 4th Street walk time), but my personal opinion is that the decisions made with respect to the crosswalk at New York Avenue and 5th Street NW as well as with respect to maintaining the highway signage (for now) place car movement over pedestrian safety.  Hopefully, DDOT will reconsider in the future.  To express your concerns, or if you have questions or would like additional information, contact DDOT's Customer Service Program Manager, Jeff Marottian.

MVSNA PEDESTRIAN SAFETY UPDATE

 

MVSNA Request:          Increase walk time of signal across N.Y. Avenue at 5th Street NW from 20 to 45 seconds.

 

DDOT Response:          At this particular time, DDOT does not recommend this change for two primary reasons.

 

                                    DDOT is concerned that changing the walk time at this intersection may negatively impact pedestrian safety at this intersection further, in addition to negatively affecting traffic flow.  We would like to share these two impacts with you.

 

                                    Signal and pedestrian timing at this intersection is set as a standardized actuated signal, which is in agreement with the Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD). Further, this standard is consistent with the requirements of Americans with Disabilities Act.  The MUTCD is the national standard for traffic signals and other infrastructure  matters.  In following these standards, the signal is designed to display visible countdown time only during the "do not walk" flashing time.  Therefore, the viewable walk time on this signal is only 20 seconds. The total time for pedestrians to cross however, is 30 seconds. The breakdown for the signal's walk time is as follows:

 

                                    5 seconds of walk time as background time (not seen)

                                    3 seconds of yellow as background time (not seen)

                                    2 seconds of all red signal as background time (not seen)

                                    20 seconds visible walk time (viewable)

 

                                    Although ten seconds are unseen, 20 seconds are still present for pedestrians to cross.  Thirty full seconds are documented as walk time in this signal.

 

                                    If the signal is changed, even in a small increment, the total cycle signal length of the entire intersection will be altered and the allowable green time for traffic will be reduced.  This could result in additional traffic delays further along New York Avenue.  An overflow of traffic may adversely affect pedestrian safety as gridlocked traffic could occur through the intersections and crosswalks.

 

MVSNA Request:          Lengthen walk time to cross N.Y. Avenue at 4th Street NW.

 

DDOT Response:          The design to rephrase the traffic signal at 4th Street and New York Avenue, NW so that safety measures are enhanced for pedestrians crossing New York Avenue, has been completed. We anticipate the traffic signal to be reconfigured by the end of next month [January 2009], if not sooner.  Additional time may be required before the signal is fully operational.

 

MVSNA Request:          Make the crosswalk across N.Y. Avenue at 5th Street NW more visible.

 

DDOT Response:          None.

 

MVSNA Request:          Provide green left turn signal eastbound when turning northbound onto 5th Street.

 

DDOT Response:          DDOT is finalizing the fully protected left turn phase for eastbound New York Avenue traffic, turning left onto northbound 5th Street.

 

Implementation:          End of April 2009.

 

MVSNA Request:          Remove/replace highway signage along N.Y. Avenue (and Mass Ave) with neighborhood-appropriate signage to discourage speeding and raise alertness of pedestrians.

DDOT Response:          New York Avenue, NW is a federal-aid route. Significant changes, including the elimination of overhead freeway signs, would initially require approval from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), as well as funding from this agency for sign replacement.  DDOT does not recommend this modification right now, but will continue to consider this suggestion in future planning.

Comments
unfortunately, there is a lot of evidence here of two things:

1) ddot is unwilling to "think outside the box" and

2) they certainly prefer to consider the concerns of drivers above that of pedestrians. there is no equivalency.

Posted By IMGoph / At 2/17/09 9:01 PM
It does appear that DDOT is more interested in traffic flow from the suburbs than the well-being of the citizens that live in the neighborhood. It appears to me that his response regarding the NY and 5th light is a take it or leave it approach. Why not have different signal times during rush hour and non-rush hour, at least that would help out sometimes so pedestrians are running across the street with their arms full of groceries.

Additionally, I think it would make sense for DDOT to look at adding some traffic calming measures at 5th and L Street. Right now 5th Street gives the appearance of a funnel for cars to zoom into up until the stop sign at M Street. I think DDOT should look at "bumping-out" the curbs at 5th and L to give the appearance of a narrower road and hopefully slow down some of the traffic coming through that intersection. This would also provide more room on the sidewalk for folks from the neighborhood to walk down to the retail.

Is someone going to follow-up regarding the crosswalk repainting? It would be nice to have a fresh crosswalk, with reflectors in it to better alert drivers that they are approaching a crosswalk.

Just some thoughts.

Posted By JohnD / At 2/18/09 2:17 PM
<b>johnd:</b> you're absolutely right—someone needs to follow up with respect to the crosswalk. if ddot had time to respond to all the other points, why did they skip that one? it's kind of a blow off of the community, not taking the time to at least say, "we disagree, it's fine the way it is."

Posted By IMGoph / At 2/18/09 2:25 PM
The highways signs on New York Avenue need to go. DDOT isn't doing it's job, they're rolling over and playing dead.
$56,000,000. will be spent at NY Ave and Florida Ave whens all said and done. and we will STILL have these disproportionate MASSIVE highway signs two blocks west. it took 10 years to get the FHWA to power wash the 395 tunnel. They clearly don't care and Delegate Norton couldn't care less either or else they'd be gone.

Posted By richard / At 2/19/09 3:18 AM
At the very least, DDOT could put a median in at the intersection of NY Ave and 5th st. Similar medians exist at crossing points up and down NY Ave, but not here. This would allow DDOT to maintain the pedestrian crossing time (which I strongly believe should be increased) and maintain traffic flow (which I strongly believe should not be the priority here), but provide a pedestrian refuge when crossing the street. Slower walkers could stop in the median if they felt it dangerous to continue crossing in the alloted time.

This would enhance pedestrian safety at an extremely low cost and have minimal impact on DDOT's precious traffic flow. This is not my preferred altenative, but SOMETHING needs to be done at this intersection.

Posted By TJM / At 2/19/09 10:03 AM
JohnD, MVSNA has pushed your suggestion on 5th and L. We included a "bump out proposal" in our original report and recommendations submitted to DDOT about 2 years ago. We also offered other/additional options, such as permitting regular parking on the 500 Block of L Street, which would effectively narrow the street and likely reduce speeding/funnel effect. There was never a response on that issue.

I'll follow up on the repainting.

TJM's median idea is a good one, though, as he points out, far from ideal. It already takes stopping at what are essentially two medians to get entirely across New York Avenue. One more, and we'll just have to rename the street Frogger Avenue NW.

Posted By Cary Silverman / At 2/20/09 8:12 AM
a median for that stretch of NY Ave was in the MVT transportation plan put out in 2005 but who knows if it'll ever get implemented. It would be nice to have some nice raised beds with pretty landscaping.

Posted By Si Kailian / At 2/20/09 9:14 AM


Blog software provided by Ray Camden