Stopping Bullets
Ok all its WTF time and let me start off by stating that I am NOT harping on the police because our officers are doing an amazing job.
Remember the last eruption of gunfire? Officers were at 5th & N and heard the shots coming from the 400 block of N and they responded immediately. The police chased 2 suspects to 4th & M between two parked cars where they were detained. They recovered weapons that had been discarded in the immediate vicinity. One male victim was grazed by a bullet. We coudn't ask for better police work.
Well, turns out the 2 (juvenile) suspects have been released without arrest. The police assert that there is not enough evidence for an arrest. How is this possible? Well I'm not really sure and I haven't gotten a very good explanation from any of the MPD brass. Is there really some sort of impossible standard that our officers have to meet to even arrest people? Do they really have to fully investigate, get lab results, essentially prove a case worthy of a court victory before even arresting a suspect? What ever happened to probable cause which seems to be abundant in this situation? I'm no lawyer but this is truly baffling and unacceptable.
Harry Jaffe recently lamented our soft gun laws and IMO he is right. These guys know that if they get caught NOTHING happens. No wonder we hear that pop pop pop! so often. There are no consequences to their actions. This week there is a vigil & funeral for a shooting victim, Chris Taylor, a sober reminder of the ultimate terrible eventuality. We can have all of the meetings, forums, programs etc. in the world but if there are no penalties this is not going to stop.
So who do we turn to? The courts, the lawyers, and the lawmakers. While you all are bickering about gun rights, perhaps you might think about penalties for abuse. I am speaking primarily to our elected leaders and Acting AG Peter Nickles
One more thing. Remember Jack Evans July 16th press release announcing Shotspotter up & running in Shaw? "Criminals Beware" & all...Well, it turns out Shotspotter isnt operational yet. At this point I dont even know what to say.
Let's give the city a black eye over this.
Posted By Charles Walker / At 8/5/08 4:31 PM
Posted By richard rogers / At 8/5/08 8:07 PM
Posted By Nicholas McKenna / At 8/5/08 9:23 PM
http://www.washingtonian.com/articles/people/8002.html
Posted By bob c / At 8/6/08 5:34 AM
Left-liberal thinking seems to defer to the criminals since criminals (in their minds) are a product of the environment. I believe (and I think most people do too) that everyone should be held accountable for their actions.
The US Attorneys refuse to prosecute many, many crimes. Their excuse is that they are overworked. Well, maybe if they prosecuted criminals, the crime rate would go down. They will give you stats of crimes they prosecute but they won't tell the number of arrests that are "no papered" ie not prosecuted.
The courts are at fault as well. A mountain of evidence is demanded. Even if the criminals are found guilty the sentences are extremely lax.
DC has more cops per capita than any other city in the US. That is not including park police, capitol police, fbi, etc. We have roughly 60 officers per 10,000 people. New York City has about 40 per 10,000. Having more cops clearly doesn't help if the courts and prosecutors won't back up the police.
It is about time the people of DC demand better courts, prosecutors, and council members.
Ed Six
Vice-Chairman
ANC2F Committee on Crime and Public Safety
Posted By ed / At 8/6/08 8:38 AM
Posted By JohnD / At 8/6/08 3:09 PM
there was criticism that having an elected attorney general wouldn't work here because some crackhead could be voted in and the stupid voters would never fire her or him.
Posted By richard rogers / At 8/6/08 7:02 PM
Posted By CARMEN / At 8/7/08 4:34 AM
Posted By Sam Farmer / At 8/7/08 4:54 AM
Posted By richard rogers / At 8/7/08 5:23 AM
Posted By Megan / At 8/7/08 9:12 AM
Posted By ed / At 8/7/08 1:28 PM


